Swing 
voters asserted  their independence again on Election Day 2011, 
repudiating Republican  ideological overreach in key votes but denying 
Democrats  clear-cut victories heading into 2012, as the cycle of 
over-reach and backlash  continues. 
In
 Mississippi, the anti-abortion “personhood” amendment to the state 
constitution was decisively defeated 58 percent to 42 percent, while at 
the same time Republican gubernatorial nominee Phil Bryant won 59 
percent of the vote over Democrat Johnnie Dupree. The two votes are 
evidence of significant ticket-splitting, even in this bastion of the 
Bible belt—a recognition that some measures are simply too extreme, and 
Republicans do not automatically vote in lockstep with the religious 
right.
The wisdom of the effort to have fetuses declared full human beings
 was questioned by national right to life groups and even Jacksonville’s
 Catholic bishop as going too far and undercutting the long-term chances
 of overturning Roe v. Wade.
For those keeping score at home, 
the personhood amendment has now been rejected in three consecutive 
elections—Colorado in 2008 and 2010, and Mississippi in 2011. If it 
could not succeed in a low-turnout, off-cycle election in one of the 
most conservative states in the nation, this particular attempt to do an
 end run around Roe v. Wade and a woman’s right to choose seems to have come to an end, though supporters will no doubt keep trying in other states.
In Ohio, Republican Gov. John Kasich’s collective bargaining reform
 was decisively defeated by a margin of 63 percent to 36 percent, 
marking a major victory for union forces in a test of their ability to 
get out the vote in advance of 2012.
The Buckeye State’s public-sector collective-bargaining reform followed the same lines as Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s controversial measures.
 Advocates said they were necessary to rein in long-term costs, while 
opponents called them ideologically driven union-busting legislation. In
 the end, there seemed to be broad recognition that the Republicans had 
overreached with the scope of this legislation, even as specific 
portions of the bill—such as requiring government workers to pay in a 
bit more for their health care—retained broad-based support and may be 
resuscitated in the next legislative session.
But before Democrats break out the 
Champagne with talk about how the Ohio vote, and Kasich’s unpopularity, 
indicates the likelihood of a pivotal win in the state in 2012, the same
 voters rejected a key provision of President Obama's signature 
health-care legislation by a similar margin, giving Ohio the ability to 
opt out of the individual mandate. In other words, many swing voters who
 rejected the collective-bargaining reform also voted against the 
individual mandate. So while the union ground game has been successfully
 tested, opposition the health-care law has its nose under the 
swing-state tent. This is not a clear-cut liberal victory.
One final note on Ohio: these two ballot initiatives spurred more than $40 million in special-interest spending, including more than $30 million by unions
 seeking to overturn collective bargaining. Tip O’Neill’s maxim that all
 politics is local has been turned on its head—increasingly, all local 
politics is national.
  An additional anti-extreme 
proof-point came in Arizona, where a rare recall vote succeeded—this 
time, not a bout of RINO hunting but an effort to turn out conservative 
State Senator Russell Pearce, author of the controversial immigration 
status inquiry bill and an ally of Sheriff Joe Arpaio. He lost not to a 
Democrat but a comparatively centrist Republican, Jerry Lewis, who 
reported incidents of attempted intimidation and was frustrated with 
Pearce giving a tone of intolerance to their community.
To round out the swing-voter theme 
of the night, Kentucky reelected its Democratic governor, Steve Beshear,
 with 56 percent of the vote over his Republican rival, a conservative 
populist clown who spent the last week of his campaign trying to make 
Hinduism an election issue. This marks the second off-cycle 
gubernatorial election Democrats have won this fall in the Appalachian 
region, following West Virginia Democratic incumbent Earl Ray Tomblin’s 
win last month. These Democratic wins have not drawn much attention, 
despite running counter to conventional wisdom. Yes, these states are 
overwhelmingly likely to vote Republican in 2012, but the fact that 
Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul’s home state reelected a Democrat as 
governor shows that voters are not pulling the lever in lockstep with 
one party.
So what are the lessons that Election Night 2011 held for 2012?
First, the 
conservative landslide of 2010 has hit its limits and is beginning to 
inspire a broad-based backlash. The rejection of the personhood 
amendment and collective-bargaining reform reflects a pushback against 
ideological overreaches. It follows the current unpopularity of swing 
state Republican governors like John Kasich, Wisconsin’s Walker, and 
Florida’s Rick Scott, who narrowly rode the 2010 wave into office and 
quickly inspired buyer’s remorse. In the high turnout 2012 election, it 
is hard to see how experience with these executives will inspire these 
swing-state voters to endorse unified conservative control of 
Washington.
The fact that Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul’s home state re-elected a Democrat as governor shows that voters are not pulling the lever in lockstep with one party.
The union 
mobilization in Ohio does reflect a resurgent ability to find common 
cause with moderates and the middle class. But the rejection of the 
individual mandate makes the vote a split decision in the Buckeye State.
In past 
recessions, populist anger was directed at either big business or big 
government. Now voter anger is directed at both, and the two parties are
 having a hard time adjusting their left/right playbooks to account for 
this shift. The anti-incumbent narrative likewise failed last night, as 
Kentucky Democrat Beshear was easily reelected. Instead, there seem to 
be a consistent impulse to reject ideological overreach, a reassuring 
sign of rational ticket-splitting even in this overheated political 
environment. Neither party should feel false confidence heading into 
2012.
            Like The Daily Beast on Facebook and
                follow us on Twitter for updates all day
                long.
John Avlon is senior columnist for Newsweek and The Daily Beast. He coedited the new anthology Deadline Artists: America's Greatest Newspaper Columns and is the author of Independent Nation: How Centrists Can Change American Politics as well as Wingnuts: How the Lunatic Fringe Is Hijacking America, published by BeastBooks. Previously, he served as chief speechwriter for New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and was a columnist and associate editor for the New York Sun. He is a CNN contributor.
 
For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.
        
John Avlon is senior columnist for Newsweek and The Daily Beast. He coedited the new anthology Deadline Artists: America's Greatest Newspaper Columns and is the author of Independent Nation: How Centrists Can Change American Politics as well as Wingnuts: How the Lunatic Fringe Is Hijacking America, published by BeastBooks. Previously, he served as chief speechwriter for New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and was a columnist and associate editor for the New York Sun. He is a CNN contributor.
For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment