Herman Cain’s presidential campaign is pushing back hard against a Politico report alleging that at least two women accused him of misconduct when he ran the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s.
It is difficult to assess the
potentially damaging allegations, as the article relies on unnamed
sources, does not identify the women, and does not detail what is said
to have happened. But the piece does say that the women received
financial settlements in the five-figure range in leaving the trade
group.
Asked for comment Sunday night,
Cain’s vice president for communications, J.D. Gordon, responded with a
statement titled “Inside the Beltway media attacks Cain.”
In the statement, Gordon accused the media of beginning “to launch unsubstantiated personal attacks on Cain.”
He added: “Dredging up thinly
sourced allegations stemming from Mr. Cain’s tenure as the chief
executive officer at the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s,
political trade press are now casting aspersions on his character and
spreading rumors that never stood up to the facts.”
Despite Gordon’s characterization
of the “political trade press” assailing his boss, what is at issue here
is a single report in Politico—one whose allegations Cain has declined
to flatly deny.
Politico says that “the women
complained of sexually suggestive behavior by Cain that made them angry
and uncomfortable” and that they later signed agreements barring them
from talking about their departures. There were “conversations allegedly
filled with innuendo or personal questions of a sexually suggestive
nature,” the report says, as well as “descriptions of physical gestures
that were not overtly sexual but that made women who experienced or
witnessed them uncomfortable.” An unnamed source cited by Politico says
one of the women cited “an unwanted sexual advance” by Cain at a hotel
where an event was being held.
In an encounter Sunday outside CBS’s Washington bureau, where he had just appeared on Face the Nation,
Cain told Politico he has “had thousands of people working for me” over
the years and could not comment “until I see some facts or some
concrete evidence.” He also declined to comment when given the name of
one of the women said to be involved.
A Politico reporter asked, “Have
you ever been accused, sir, in your life of harassment by a woman?” The
Republican candidate is described as having glared at the reporter and,
after the question had been repeated a third time, asking, “Have you ever been accused of sexual harassment?”
Gordon, without issuing a specific
denial, portrayed Cain as a victim of larger forces: “Since Washington
establishment critics haven’t had much luck in attacking Mr. Cain’s
ideas to fix a bad economy and create jobs, they are trying to attack
him in any way they can. Sadly, we’ve seen this movie played out
before—a prominent conservative targeted by liberals simply because they
disagree with his politics.” Cain has responded to past criticism by
casting himself as an outsider taking on the Republican power structure.
In the article, Gordon said Cain
was “vaguely familiar” with the situation and referred detailed
questions to Peter Kilgore, the restaurant group’s general counsel, who
held that job when Cain headed the association from 1996 to 1999.
Kilgore told Politico he could not comment on personnel matters.
Whether the allegations become a serious impediment for Cain, the former pizza executive
who has surged to the top of most GOP presidential polls, depends in
part on how loudly they ricochet through the media echo chamber. Several
weeks of bad publicity over mistakes and missteps on such matters as Cain’s position on abortion
and an electrified border fence have done little to slow his rise. Many
voters appear to cut him considerable slack as an avowed
non-politician.
The arc of the story will also
depend on whether anyone comes forward to corroborate the allegations on
the record, and whether the women choose to surface publicly. Politico
quotes Denise Marie Fugo, chairwoman of the association’s board at the
time of Cain’s departure, as calling him “very gracious” and saying of
the allegations, “I have never heard that. It would be news to me.”
Even if confirmed, the allegations
fall far short of what other politicians have been forced to acknowledge
in the post-Lewinsky era. In describing comments that made subordinates
uncomfortable, they are more reminiscent of Anita Hill’s complaints
about Clarence Thomas, which became public during his 1991 Supreme Court
confirmation hearings.
Bill
Clinton remains enormously popular, despite his affair with a White
House intern that led the House to impeach him. Newt Gingrich, one of
Cain’s GOP rivals and the man who led the impeachment drive, has
acknowledged having an affair with a House staffer who is now his third
wife, Callista. Gavin Newsom was elected lieutenant governor of
California last year despite admitting an affair with the wife of a
former top aide.
Whether the allegations become a serious impediment for Cain depends in part on how loudly they ricochet through the media echo chamber.
On the
other hand, Anthony Weiner was forced to give up his House seat earlier
this year for sending graphic texts and nude photos to women he had
never met.
The
underfinanced Cain campaign relies heavily on television interviews, and
it is hard to imagine that the candidate will not be forced to offer a
more detailed explanation of what happened in the late 1990s.
One thing
is clear: the fact that Herman Cain’s past is being dredged for dirt is a
sign that he is finally being taken seriously as a presidential
candidate—and that the most difficult part of his campaign may lie
ahead.
The Daily Beast
The Daily Beast
Cain denounces bombshell sexual harassment claims from two women. So far, he has not denied them. The candidate is deflecting but not denying a report that two women received settlements in the 1990s after accusing him of inappropriate behavior.
ReplyDeletepjsoft
ReplyDeleteHoward, you forgot a few sex scandals that took place in recent memory. How is David Vitters call girl scandal in DC and LA, Larry Craig's wide stance in bathrooms, Mark Foley's harrassment of house male pages, and John Ensign's recent resignation a day before he was to be tossed out in violation of ethics rules not worthy of note in your article? All previously mentioned were holding office when the scandals took place.
AnIndividuallikes this.
Reply