Excerpt from Truthout
It was not always thus. It would have been hard to find an uneducated farmer during the depression of the 1890s who did not have a very accurate idea about exactly which economic interests were shafting him. An unemployed worker in a breadline in 1932 would have felt little gratitude to the Rockefellers or the Mellons. But that is not the case in the present economic crisis. After a riot of unbridled greed such as the world has not seen since the conquistadors' looting expeditions and after an unprecedented broad and rapid transfer of wealth upward by Wall Street and its corporate satellites, where is the popular anger directed, at least as depicted in the media? At "Washington spending" - which has increased primarily to provide unemployment compensation, food stamps and Medicaid to those economically damaged by the previous decade's corporate saturnalia. Or the popular rage is harmlessly diverted against pseudo-issues: death panels, birtherism, gay marriage, abortion, and so on, none of which stands to dent the corporate bottom line in the slightest.
If voters want a plutocracy, it is their right. If they desire the corporations to call the shots, they should study what they did during the Mussolini Fascist regime in Italy.
ReplyDeleteCorporate advertising has become more effective since the commercials for aspirin with mallets pounding heads. Taking their clues from TV, the audience has deteriorated badly.They are no longer the sophisticates of 1890 and 1932.