Inside Occupy Wall Street: Journalist-Participant Describes What Life Is Really Like (Complicated and Inspiring) at Zuccotti Park
October 11, 2011 |
Photo Credit: edenpictures on Flickr
TAKE ACTION
Along
with New York City, Occupy Wall Street (Occupy Everything)
demonstrations are now sweeping the nation, with meetups in 1,383
cities. What the media once portrayed as either a lazy hippie or
anarchist blip in time has become an undeniable social movement with
long-term potential. And as Occupy Wall St. gains steam and supporters,
the rich elites in control of our democracy have become defensive, while
others embrace the movement. Those who are afraid are doing their best
to delegitimize the movement, such as New York Times columnist David Brooks, with his veiled smear of demonstrators focusing on a seven-year-old article in Adbusters he described as anti-Semitic. But as everyone knows, beyond encouragement in the magazine, Adbusters has had almost nothing to do with OWS.
The most common criticisms of OWS, from corporates and skeptics
alike, are "I don't even know what they want" or the allegation of
disorganization. But demonstrators are not simply camping out to ask the
corporate government for legislation, they are creating the change they
desire; creating a democracy that is direct and representative of all
members of the 99 percent. Occupy Wall St. is actually far more
organized than the mainstream media and critics may suggest. The lack of
one common goal is not disorganization, but freedom. I've been on the
ground at Occupy Wall St. -- sleeping, marching, getting arrested, and
reporting almost daily, and I can tell you that most of the media have
the story all wrong. Here is what's really happening.
People are living, and thriving, in the space. Using donations,
demonstrators have set up their own society, with free books, food and
(minimal) health care. When I slept there Sunday night, I found I had
almost everything I needed to survive. There was plenty of food -- baked
ziti, fruit and cookies -- laid out in the buffet-style line. Between
meals and late at night, there is always something to munch on, usually
healthy foods like apples and bananas.
After I finished eating, my friends and I searched for a place to
set up camp. By 8pm, just finding an unoccupied spot was difficult. When
we finally posted up by the steps at Broadway, we grabbed a bunch of
cardboard signs and stacked them underneath a yoga mat and tarp, then
wandered off to socialize. About 9pm, I got a text from an organizer
named Anthony saying "Wall St. and Broad. Now!" I hurried over to find a
sight much more peaceful than I expected.
About 10 people stood on the sidewalk with their backs to a
barrier, talking quietly as one man slept on the street-side of the
sidewalk next to a barrier. Another couple seemed ready to sleep as
well. They started to lie down, and as the police started talking, the
rules kept changing. First, the police moved the street-side barrier
inward so that one of the legs wasn't "on the street." Then, it was OK
to sit up, but not lie down, on the sidewalk. Then, half the sidewalk
had to be open. Then, we had to be moving. A group of protestors walked
back and forth on the block, joking with the police about the ridiculous
call with lines like "I don't mean to be a stickler, officer, but
they're not moving" and "Officer! Officer! I can't walk!"
Next thing you know, white-shirted cops were putting up barriers to
block off Wall St. Officers were demanding people show ID to enter the
sidewalk. Then all entrances to Wall St. were blocked. Suddenly, cops
shouted "This is a frozen zone!" and we all had to leave. Notably, amid
all the overreaction from the police, there were only a handful of
demonstrators still pacing on the sidewalk.
After the spectacle, I drank a few cups of water, ate some cookies,
and chatted with some college kids who had road-tripped all the way
from North Carolina just to stay for the weekend. Before going to sleep,
I went to the McDonald's bathroom to pee. Inside the restaurant
(called, ironically, the "people's McDonald's"), organizers and press
utilized the free wifi and pounded away at keyboards. In the bathroom, a
girl charged her phone; others were in their pajamas, waiting, like me,
for one last, late-night bathroom trip.
Back at camp, I was wide awake for hours. People were skateboarding
down the sidewalk, quietly strumming guitars, discussing, debating, and
arguing with the press for photographing people who were asleep. It was
not disturbingly loud, but just enough to keep my eyelids forcing
themselves open. When I finally did fall asleep, I slept hard. I rolled
over at the crack of dawn to witness an ironic scene, blurry without my
contacts, of suits surrounding the park and walking to work. When I woke
up again, it was to a mic-check announcement that a girl was being
arrested for writing on the sidewalk with chalk.
Although it may appear chaotic to the outside observer, the
decision-making process in Liberty Plaza is incredibly organized. The
working groups are the subcultures of the larger movement, and within
them like-minded individuals share ideas and use their own particular
creativity. The working groups ensure that no ideas are lost, while the
general assembly (GA) assures that none becomes tyrannical. That all
opinions are considered is perhaps the best rebuttal to offer people who
have yet to understand Occupy Wall St. If you are part of the 99
percent exploited by corporations and their government, but dislike
Occupy Wall St., don't write off the demonstrators; join them and ask
questions -- create your own change.
Speaking for Occupy Wall St.'s dedication to inclusiveness and
tolerance is that anyone can form a working group. To create one of
these panels, designed for similarly knowledgeable or passionate persons
to share their insight and creativity, any individual may announce at a
general assembly that he or she would like to start a new group. Once
established, the group holds meetings, the time and place of which are
announced at the GA, and anyone is welcome to attend.
Working groups are free to act in accordance with their own
desires. They may problem-solve and ask for additional help -- the
sanitation group, for example, often makes announcements asking people
to help clean up after themselves. But should a working group wish to
make a suggestion that may reach beyond itself to affect the whole
group, a representative or facilitator, often someone who is either the
most knowledgeable or long-term member (and they shift) presents the
idea at the general assembly. There, a vote determines whether the
initiative will go forward. GA facilitators represent a working group
themselves. Because they make sure the assemblies run smoothly, visitors
may perceive them to be in a leadership position. But it is the crowd,
not the speakers, who check egos and leaders to be sure the movement
remains egalitarian.
Because general assemblies gather hoards of people, often hundreds,
the human microphone technique is used to amplify voices. Speakers
announce part of a sentence, which is echoed by the crowd in waves. The
tediousness of the human-mic process works to check the hardcore
rhetorical itself: To deliver a point requires great effort and
patience. To speed along the process, however, hand signals are used in
communication. Circling -- or rolling -- your arms means "speed it up,"
and creating a diamond with your fingers suggests a problem with "point
of process." This signal is used when someone's announcement is
off-topic or opinionated; at the GA, only factual information is
requested. Afterward, as GA facilitators often announce, there is time
for "soap box." Other hand signals communicate agreement, or lack
thereof. Wiggling fingers pointed upward signal "I like that" or "I'm
feeling good" while fingers pointed straight down mean the opposite. The
need for more discussion or uncertainty is expressed by fingers
straight out in front.
One of the most beautiful elements of the general assembly is
"progressive stacking," a mechanism by which facilitators remind
speakers to encourage diversity. While it can be a touchy subject,
progressive stacking asks white males to step down and realize that
others have been exploited or disenfranchised their whole lives. But the
GAs and working groups are not the only times ideas are expressed. All
day in the park, enthusiasts show up and exchange pertinent information.
Some, like Naomi Klein, Slavoj Zizek and Jeffrey Sachs have been more
influential than others. But aside from celebrity voices, regular people
continually express their opinions as well. Mic-checks are conducted
without planning, and with the voice of the crowd, one person can easily
share information. Incredibly, all of the ideas and voices are out in
the open -- right there to be soaked in, exchanged and debated.
But as crowds gather in growing numbers in Liberty Plaza, the
visibility and egalitarianism of Occupy Wall St. is challenged. Some
working groups have moved off-site; not far, but a few blocks away on
Wall St. As organizer Scott Simpson, 22, said, "Some people are worried
that it raises visibility issues. Because it's not in the park, it's
more difficult for people to know when and where a meeting is being
held."
The influx of people at Liberty Plaza has generated a few more
concerns. The communal movement has attracted people from all walks of
life, and as people with personal issues and various types of
self-promoters squeeze in, the ecosystem shows some fragility.
There is always music and constant crowding, with people bumping
shoulders and stepping on toes every once in a while. Usually, these
kinds of exchanges actually end well. But sometimes, people argue --
rushing someone to hurry in line, demanding cigarettes, etc. Typically
the argugments occur between some less understanding campers, and the
crowd peacefully intervenes to separate them and remind them why they
are there. Organizers do not accept belligerence. Not too long ago in
Liberty Plaza, a long mic-checked announcement declared "This is not a
dive bar...This is not Bonnaroo."
Yet the community has hung together despite unavoidable pressures
from the outside. Marginal personalities -- perhaps those with emotional
issues or on drugs -- will inevitably turn up at a space offering free
food and mass camp-outs. The presence of these types has the potential
to undermine the efforts of the whole, and can add tension to the
ability of organizers and activists trying to keep things running
smoothly. Checked behavior from the crowd is the most common response,
but more advanced responses are necessary for the drug-addicted
population.
Pauly, a medic who did not wish to give his last name, said
"Ninety-nine percent of the people are here for the right reasons," but
acknowledged the safety threat posed by drug use in the park. He also
said that organizers have identified a core group of drug users and are
formulating the best method to deal with them. Pauly says medics will
undergo training to deal with overdoses, and New York City needle
exchange groups will set up nearby. The goal is not to punish or kick
out drug addicts, but to treat their disease. Still, after refusing
methadone treatment, a handful of drug users have been asked to leave.
The problem is they keep coming back.
But, according to Pauly, "It is going to work itself out very
soon." The medical working group is focusing on bringing in support from
the community to work on solutions. Case and social workers, he said,
could be pulled in to help diffuse situations where drug users refuse to
leave by "giving them some logic." The issue, he said, is the safety of
the masses.
The issue of drug use also draws attention to the potential for a
shift in organization. While Pauly said more organization and leadership
may become crucial for safety reasons, Tim Weldon, 35, also predicts a
change in organization. Not one leader, but leadership in the form of
something like a council of the most knowledgeable, could "take the most
pronounced symptoms and express them more clearly in a systematic
manner," which would allow for "more coherence in ourselves," and the
ability to "take more of a stance on specific situations."
It is important to remember that Occupy Wall St. is a new movement.
As ideas solidify and hardcore supporters stick around, the information
and message will become more concrete. But for now, organizers are
working on creating the movement, generating ideas and solidifying the
process capable of sparking vital change.
Kristen Gwynne is a freelance writer and an editorial assistant at AlterNet.
No comments:
Post a Comment