Occupy Wall Street Trades in 'The Whole World is Watching' for Watching the Whole World
October 7, 2011 |
Photo Credit: Nick Turse
NEW YORK, NY -- More
than 40 years ago, he was in the thick of protests here. And here he
was, again, joining in the Occupy Wall Street protests in Lower
Manhattan -- marching a pre-approved route inside a police cordon from
the heart of the movement in Zuccotti Park to a pre-approved rally in a
city square, where traditional activist speakers said
traditional activist things to a crowd that, while it wasn’t lacking
energy, did nothing that wasn’t traditional for city protests of
the last 15 years.
An aging
radical, his heyday was a time when, as the police beat them in the
streets of Chicago during the 1968 Democratic National Convention under
the glare of television cameras, American youth chanted in
unison: “The whole world is watching.” (A phrase today’s New York City
protesters resurrected when recently set upon by police
on the Brooklyn Bridge.) He mentioned his thoughts to a group
of us: The Wall Street protests would have erupted years sooner, if not
for the election of President Obama. On the face of it, the
analysis seemed credible. Earnest young Americans had put their faith
in an dashing young president who seemed to promise hope and
change, only to have their dreams dashed on the hard realities of
expanding wars, moral comprises, and policies that cater to the
rich at the expense of the “other 99 percent,” as the protesters term
themselves.
As public
intellectual Tom Engelhardt, who attended that same rally, has noted,
the protests have almost nothing to do with President Obama. He
might as well be a non-entity. Engelhardt wrote: “Amid the
kaleidoscopic range of topics on those signs and in those chants and
cries, one thing, one name, was largely missing: the
president's. In those hours marching and at Foley Square amid the din
of so many thousands of massed people, I saw one sign that said
'Obama = Bush' and another that went something like 'The Barack Obama
we elected would be out here with us.' That was it. Sayonara.”
The Occupy Wall Street movement has so much more to do with Mohamed Bouazizi, Bradley Manning, and Mona Seif --
all of them in their 20s, all of them breaking new
ground -- than it does Barack Obama. (And none of them were influenced
by the American president in anything but the most
indirect ways.) The nascent Occupy Wall Street
movement, by most accounts, wasn’t watching and waiting for
Obama to save them -- although plenty of Americans no doubt were -- it
was watching similarly young activists in Tunisia, Egypt,
Libya, Bahrain, Iraq, Yemen, Syria, Greece, Syria, Spain, Belarus and
elsewhere. Back in the '60s, Americans said the whole world
was watching; today Occupy Wall Street activists are watching the whole
world for ideas and inspiration.
If
the Occupy Wall Street movement succeeds, whatever that means, it will
be because of their youth, inexperience and ability to fend off
cooptation and the sure-to-be-destructive advice of aging
activists, political opportunists, and liberal commentators with their
failed prescriptions, faulty analysis and hopeless notions
of “proper” protests. It will be because of a worldwide movement of
action-oriented young people to whom Barack Obama is less
than an afterthought.
For
26-year-old Tunisian fruit peddler Mohammed Bouazizi, harassment by the
police was the final straw in a short life filled with economic
privation and few opportunities. Angry at having been mistreated
by the local security forces, Bouazizi marched to the local governor's
office in his hometown of Sidi Bouzid to air his grievances.
"If you don't see me, I'll burn myself," he reportedly declared upon
being rebuffed. Within an hour of his humiliation at the hands
of the security forces, he had doused himself with gasoline set himself
aflame in protest.
Because lighting yourself on fire will sure affect change? I sure hope OWS doesn't come to that....and if it is to be effective at all, we need the voices and support of ALL generations, and less divisiveness and ego over who is in charge, and whose message should take center stage.
ReplyDelete