Americans Demonstrate Changed Attitudes Towards Poverty Since the 2008 Economic Crisis
by:
Marianne Mollman, RH Reality Check
| News Analysis
If you are poor, chances are it is your own fault. At least that’s what Americans thought in 2001. In a National Public Radio poll from that year, about half of those surveyed said the poor are not doing enough to pull themselves out of poverty.
Now, one would think that since the recent economic crisis predictably
has led to increased poverty people would start blaming circumstances
more than the poor. This has not been the case in the United Kingdom. A
recently publishedsurvey shows
that Brits over time have become more likely to blame poor people
themselves for their financial trouble. From 1986 to 2009, the
proportion of people who attribute poverty to
laziness and lack of willpower has grown to a little under 30 percent,
with the proportion blaming “injustice in our society” conversely
falling.
People’s attitudes towards poverty to some extent determine sentiments
about health care, welfare benefits, and other collective interventions.
Not surprisingly, the UK study found that more and more Brits believe
government benefits are too high.
In the United States, the picture is, perhaps surprisingly, a bit more nuanced. The 2001 NPR poll shows
that attitudes about welfare at that time were determined by the income
of the person asked. Those who made more than twice the poverty level
were almost twice as likely as those closer to being poor to say that
welfare recipients had easy lives and could do very well without the
benefits if only they tried.
This difference is significant. Since household income has been declining over
time (and proportionally fewer individuals earn more than twice the
poverty level), the silver lining of the 2008 crisis might be that more
Americans start seeing poverty for what it is: not something anyone
“deserves.” This could even help bring about more coherent anti-poverty
policies when politicians, many of whom seem to want to appeal to the
“poor people are lazy” sentiment as a way to obtain votes, realize their
constituents understand reality better than they do.
And poverty is, in fact, becoming reality for more and more people in the United States.
In 2010 more people were recorded as living in poverty than in any of
the previous 52 years for which rates have been published: 46.9 million (representing 15 percent of the population). About 17.2 millionhouseholds
were registered as food insecure for that same year, meaning they
didn’t have consistent dependable access to enough food. This, again, is
the highest number ever recorded in the United States. Even percentage-wise, poverty rates in 2010 were the highest they had been since 1993.
And poverty is not just something people “are,” something that might be
inconvenient and often frustrating (though it surely is both of those
things in copious amounts).
Poverty is a very real obstacle to exercising human rights, bringing
with it substandard housing, under-resourced schooling, lack of health
care, and at times unsafe neighbourhoods, as well as many other
disadvantages. Children are
particularly affected, since years of poorer quality education and
potentially unhealthy living has consequences that to some extent
continue even after a family pulls out of poverty—which only some ever
do.
And not only is poverty an obstacle to exercising rights. It is also,
in many cases, caused by rights violations. Four million more women than
men live in poverty, and both African-Americans and Hispanics are
over-represented amongst the poor. In 2010, women earned 77 cents to every dollar earned by men. For black women that figure is 68 cents, for Hispanic women 59. Unemployment rates fluctuate enormously according to sex, race, and marital status. Women constitute 65 percent of all part-time workers.
To be sure, everyone is ultimately responsible for how they deal with
their circumstances, and some individuals pull out of poverty despite
multiple odds stacked against them. But many more do not. This is not
because poverty is inevitable. It is because it generally requires
support for health care, education, housing, anti-discrimination
initiatives, and other interventions at least partially sponsored by the
government. Without addressing the growing poverty in the United States
through collective action based on human rights, chances are that if you are poor you will stay poor. Through little fault of your own.
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.
This article is republished from RH Reality Check, a progressive online publication covering global reproductive and sexual health news and information.
This article is republished from RH Reality Check, a progressive online publication covering global reproductive and sexual health news and information.
No comments:
Post a Comment