MoveOn.org seeks Mitt's Indictment on Tax Lying

This morning, MoveOn.org submitted the 7-page legal analysis and a letter calling for an investigation to the U.S. Department of Justice. The analysis contends that there is good reason to believe GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney may be criminally liable for false statements he made in 2011 in his federal financial disclosure filing (form SF-278)—in apparent violation of the federal False Statements Act (18 U.S.C. §1001).
Romney claimed in his disclosure filing that he departed from “any” active role in Bain Capital in 1999, which would be politically convenient because it was before Bain Capital was most heavily involved in outsourcing jobs. However, the legal analysis released today, which includes a review of state law in Delaware, where Bain Capital was incorporated, concludes that existing evidence is “clearly inconsistent with [Romney’s] flat disavowal of ‘any’ involvement in the ‘operations of any Bain Capital entity in any way’” after 1999.
“Candidates for office—especially an office as important as the presidency—need tell the truth, even when it isn’t pretty,” said Justin Ruben, Executive Director of MoveOn.org Political Action. “When it comes to disclosing their finances, that’s not just a moral obligation, it’s a legal one. We asked one of the country’s most prominent election law attorneys to look into Romney’s disclosures, and his conclusions are startling. Romney’s failure to level with voters may well be criminal. It is time for the Justice Department to investigate.”
The letter calling for an investigation and the legal analysis were sent to the DOJ’s Chief of Public Integrity this morning, and MoveOn members are making phone calls to the DOJ today to urge that it begin an investigation.
Melanie Sloan, Executive Director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), reviewed the legal analysis and seconded MoveOn’s call for an investigation. “CREW strongly supports a Department of Justice investigation into the evidence that Mitt Romney remained involved with Bain Capital after 1999, given that he stated the exact opposite in his financial disclosure forms in apparent violation of the False Statements Act,” Sloan said.
It is undisputed that Romney was the sole director, Chief Executive Officer and President of Bain Capital, Inc. at least through the middle of 2000. MoveOn’s analysis finds that under Delaware law, while he held these titles, Romney was legally required to maintain “reasonable oversight” of Bain, which contradicts Romney’s claim in his 2011 disclosure filing that he did not have “any” involvement in Bain after 1999.