The Text of Magna Carta
Introductory Note
As might be expected, the text of the Magna Carta of 1215 bears many
traces of haste, and is clearly the product of much bargaining and
many hands. Most of its clauses deal with specific, and often
long-standing, grievances rather than with general principles of
law. Some of the grievances are self-explanatory: others can be
understood only in the context of the feudal society in which they
arose. Of a few clauses, the precise meaning is still a matter of
argument.
In feudal society, the king's barons held their lands `in fee'
(feudum) from the king, for an oath to him of loyalty and obedience,
and with the obligation to provide him with a fixed number of knights
whenever these were required for military service. At first the barons
provided the knights by dividing their estates (of which the largest
and most important were known as `honours') into smaller parcels
described as `knights' fees', which they distributed to tenants able
to serve as knights. But by the time of King John it had become more
convenient and usual for the obligation for service to be commuted for
a cash payment known as `scutage', and for the revenue so obtained to
be used to maintain paid armies.
Besides military service, feudal custom allowed the king to make
certain other exactions from his barons. In times of emergency, and on
such special occasions as the marriage of his eldest daughter, he
could demand from them a financial levy known as an `aid'
(auxilium). When a baron died, he could demand a succession
duty or `relief' (relevium) from the baron's heir. If there was
no heir, or if the succession was disputed, the baron's lands could be
forfeited or `escheated' to the Crown. If the heir was under age, the
king could assume the guardianship of his estates, and enjoy all the
profits from them-ven to the extent of despoliation-until the heir
came of age. The king had the right, if he chose, to sell such a
guardianship to the highest bidder, and to sell the heir himself in
marriage for such price as the value of his estates would command. The
widows and daughters of barons might also be sold in marriage. With
their own tenants, the barons could deal similarly.
The scope for extortion and abuse in this system, if it were not
benevolently applied, was obviously great and had been the subject of
complaint long before King John came to the throne. Abuses were,
moreover, aggravated by the difficulty of obtaining redress for them,
and in Magna Carta the provision of the means for obtaining a fair
hearing of complaints, not only against the king and his agents but
against lesser feudal lords, achieves corresponding importance.
About two-thirds of the clauses of the Magna Carta of 1215 are
concerned with matters such as these, and with the misuse of their
powers by royal officials. As regards other topics, the first clause,
conceding the freedom of the Church, and in particular confirming its
right to elect its own dignitaries without royal interference,
reflects John's dispute with the Pope over Stephen Langton's election
as archbishop of Canterbury: it does not appear in the Articles of the
Barons, and its somewhat stilted phrasing seems in part to be
attempting to justify its inclusion, none the less, in the charter
itself. The clauses that deal with the royal forests (§§ 44,
47, 48), over which the king had special powers and jurisdiction,
reflect the disquiet and anxieties that had arisen on account of a
longstanding royal tendency to extend the forest boundaries, to the
detriment of the holders of the lands affected. Those that deal with
debts (§§ 9-1l) reflect administrative problems created by
the chronic scarcity of ready cash among the upper and middle classes,
and their need to resort to money-lenders when this was required. The
clause promising the removal of fish-weirs (§ 33) was intended to
facilitate the navigation of rivers. A number of clauses deal with the
special circumstances that surrounded the making of the charter, and
are such as might be found in any treaty of peace. Others, such as
those relating to the city of London (§ 13) and to merchants
(§ 41), clearly represent concessions to special interests.
Link: http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/magnacarta.asp
Link: http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/magnacarta.asp
No comments:
Post a Comment